DIYprojects.info
DIY Guides | DIY Projects | DIY forums, newsgroups



SearchSearch
RegisterRegister Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages ProfileProfile Log inLog in
LYDIA M THATCHER AKA Dee Dee age 47 925-968-9763 795 #252 wa

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Index -> Roses (rec.gardens.roses)
Author Message
Guest






PostPosted: Sat May 19, 2007 5:25 am    Post subject: LYDIA M THATCHER AKA Dee Dee age 47 925-968-9763 795 #252 wa Reply with quote

LYDIA M THATCHER AKA Dee Dee age 47 925-968-9763 795 #252 waston
canyon ct. san ramon,ca 94583450 BOLLINGER CANYON LN # 189 SAN RAMON
CA 94582 likes to write bad checks Options

Subject: LYDIA M THATCHER AKA Dee Dee age 47 925-968-9763 795 #252
waston canyon ct. san ramon,ca 94583450 BOLLINGER CANYON LN # 189 SAN
RAMON CA 94582 likes to write bad checks
Reply | Reply to author | Forward | Print | Individual message | Show
original | Remove | Report this message | Find messages by this
author
LYDIA M THATCHER AKA Dee Dee age 47
925-968-9763 795 #252 waston canyon ct.
san ramon,ca 94583
450 BOLLINGER CANYON LN # 189
SAN RAMON CA 94582

likes to write bad checks bad checks ,
NSF checks, bad check, NSF check
Background CheckCriminal Records
called LYDIA M THATCHER 3 times and left her
voice mail to call me the 4th. time i called her at
6am she hungup the 5th time i called at 602am
she would not talk to me about the bad check
she said it was to early and that she would call
me at work she never did. i told her she was
avoiding me that i have called you 3 times and
left voice mail telling her to call me over the last
4 days she said she was not avoiding me.

Writing NSF checks is a criminal act. Over
certain amounts it becomes a Felony.


You should first take the NSF check to the
local prosecutor/district attorney's office and file
a CRIMINAL complaint.


you can turn the check over to a Collection
Agency or Collection Attorney, who will take
over tracking down, prosecuting and collecting
from the deadbeat. If/when
they collect you usually get 50% of the face value of
the check. Otherwise it costs you nothing at all.


Ideally I would like to go to small claims court,
No, that's not "ideally"


Winning the case is easy, *collecting* the judgement
is the hard part. Best to leave it up to the Professionals,
either the DA, a Collection Agency,
or a Collection Lawyer.
Back to top
Simon Templar
Guest





PostPosted: Sat May 19, 2007 6:35 am    Post subject: Re: LYDIA M THATCHER AKA Dee Dee and SPAM thread Reply with quote

shelikesbadchecks@hotmail.com wrote:
Quote:
Winning the case is easy, *collecting* the judgement
is the hard part. Best to leave it up to the Professionals,
either the DA, a Collection Agency,
or a Collection Lawyer.

Personally I don't give a *** because it is just SPAM.




--
The views I present are that of my own and NOT of any organisation I may
belong to.

73 de Simon, VK3XEM.
<http://web.acma.gov.au/pls/radcom/client_search.client_lookup?pCLIENT_NO=157452>
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Index -> Roses (rec.gardens.roses) All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 

FAQFAQ  MemberlistMemberlist  UsergroupsUsergroups

Featured Site: Free Antivirus and Antispyware Info



Powered by p|-|pBB
Usenet and forums posts belong to their respective authors. Everything else is (c) 2004 - 2006 Web-S-Sense Pty. Ltd.
Terms and Conditions of Use